Part of The GMP Training AcademyAll GMP courses
Teams and sites

Train the whole team before the next inspection

Seat licences for the department or the site, a manager view of progress and results, and completion records exported for the training matrix. Hosted on The GMP Training Academy.

Run the numbers

Against the classroom course you were quoted

Budget holders compare on total cost, not list price. This does the comparison honestly, including the time your people spend away from the line.

Compare with the classroom course you were quoted

Enter your numbers. Nothing is stored. Time off site is counted for both options, and the online course is charged at its 2.5 hours of study, not zero.

Classroom fees (12 × €1,400)
€16,800
Classroom time off site (12 × 2 d × €450)
€10,800
Classroom total
€27,600
Online seats (12 × €0, 5 to 19 seats, 15% off)
Enter a budget
Online study time (2.5 h each)
€1,800
Online total
Enter a budget

You keep

€25,800

and nobody leaves the site for two days before the inspection.

Why training is the best line in the quality budget

Trained people make fewer defects, close faster and stay.

Regulators treat training as part of the quality system, not a favour to staff: EU GMP Chapter 2 requires it, requires its effectiveness to be assessed, and requires the records to prove it. The evidence says the same thing in numbers. Below: what the published studies found, what it looks like on your change control KPIs, and the clause behind it.

  • 41%

    fewer quality defects

    in the most engaged teams compared with the least engaged, across 112,000 business units. Engagement and development opportunities are measured together. [1]

  • 26%

    greater ability to deliver quality products

    in organisations with a strong learning culture compared with those without. [2]

  • 37%

    higher employee productivity

    in the same strong-learning-culture organisations; output per person, not hours. [2]

  • 94%

    would stay longer

    of employees, at a company that invests in their learning. Retention is the quality metric nobody puts on the dashboard. [3]

The change control KPIs a trained team moves

These are the numbers a QA head reports at management review and an inspector asks for. No invented percentages here: measure yours before and six months after, and you will have your own.

EU GMP Chapter 2 (2.10 to 2.13): all personnel whose activities could affect product quality receive training, its practical effectiveness is periodically assessed, and the programme is approved by the head of Production or Quality Control as appropriate. Training records are kept. ICH Q10 section 2.4 lists training among the resources senior management must provide for the quality system. [4]
  1. 01

    Overdue change controls

    Measured as: % of open changes past their target date

    Lower is better

    Change owners who classify correctly and scope the impact assessment on day one do not stall at approval. Overdue falls; controlled extension with a rationale replaces silent lateness.

  2. 02

    Changes implemented before approval

    Measured as: % of audited changes

    Lower is better

    People who understand what counts as a change, and why the approval gate exists, stop making the small change first and raising the record afterwards. This is the finding inspectors write up most.

  3. 03

    Impact assessments complete first time

    Measured as: % accepted without QA return

    Higher is better

    Cross-functional impact written to the standard the first time: validation, regulatory, supply and training questions asked at classification, not discovered at closure. QA review becomes review, not rewriting.

  4. 04

    Time to approval

    Measured as: median days, raised to approved

    Lower is better

    A clear classification, a complete impact assessment and named approvers cut the loops between the change owner and QA. Fewer returns, fewer meetings, faster approval.

  5. 05

    Effectiveness checks passed

    Measured as: % of checks passed at review

    Higher is better

    Effectiveness criteria defined before implementation, measuring whether the change delivered what it promised rather than whether the actions were ticked. Passed checks mean the change worked.

  6. 06

    Changes closed with all actions verified

    Measured as: % closed with objective evidence of every action

    Higher is better

    Closure with evidence cited by identifier: the updated SOP number, the training record, the validation report. No change is closed on a promise, so no dossier mismatch is found later.

Be first when the course opens

Leave a work email. You are notified before public launch and get the launch price. Nothing else is sent.

Sources
  1. [1]Gallup (2020). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes: Q12 Meta-Analysis, 10th edition. 112,312 business units in 96 countries. Top-quartile business units on engagement showed 41% fewer quality defects, 81% lower absenteeism and 18% to 43% lower turnover than bottom-quartile units. Cross-industry meta-analysis. Gallup's engagement measure includes development and learning opportunities.
  2. [2]Bersin and Associates (2010). High-Impact Learning Culture: The 40 Best Practices for Creating an Empowered Enterprise. Organisations with a strong learning culture were 26% more able to deliver quality products, showed 37% greater employee productivity and were 46% more likely to be first to market. Cross-industry survey of about 40,000 organisations.
  3. [3]LinkedIn Learning (2018). Workplace Learning Report: The Rise and Responsibility of Talent Development in the New Labor Market. 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invested in their career development. Cross-industry employee survey.
  4. [4]EudraLex Volume 4, EU Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice, Part I, Chapter 2: Personnel (2013), paragraphs 2.10 to 2.13. ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (2008), section 2.4 Resource management. The regulatory requirement for training and for assessing its effectiveness.
What a team licence includes

Seats, oversight, records

  • One seat per learner, assigned by the manager, transferable before first login
  • Manager view: progress, assessment results by module, certificates issued
  • Completion export (CSV) formatted for the training matrix
  • Certificates with verifiable IDs an auditor can check
  • Content mapped to your SOP numbers on request
  • Optional live Q&A session with the course author for the team
Volume pricing

Per seat, by tier

1 to 4 seatsList priceOn launch
5 to 19 seats15% offOn launch
20 to 49 seats25% offOn launch
50 seats and above35% offOn launch

The discount tiers are fixed. The launch price is announced to the waitlist first.

Ready to talk?

Tell us the seat count and the deadline

A person replies within two working days with a quote, or you can buy seats directly on the academy.